Aclaris Therapeutics, Inc.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, DHR-PB has a market cap of 916.76B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while DHR-PB trades at $1,261.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas DHR-PB's P/E ratio is 146.01. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to DHR-PB's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to DHR-PB. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, TMO has a market cap of 155.02B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while TMO trades at $410.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas TMO's P/E ratio is 24.09. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to TMO's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to TMO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, DHR has a market cap of 139.40B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while DHR trades at $194.78.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas DHR's P/E ratio is 37.68. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to DHR's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to DHR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, LZAGF has a market cap of 50.62B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while LZAGF trades at $719.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas LZAGF's P/E ratio is 66.41. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to LZAGF's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to LZAGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, LZAGY has a market cap of 49.99B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while LZAGY trades at $69.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas LZAGY's P/E ratio is 64.16. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to LZAGY's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to LZAGY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, IDXX has a market cap of 39.41B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while IDXX trades at $489.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas IDXX's P/E ratio is 45.37. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to IDXX's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to IDXX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, A has a market cap of 30.99B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while A trades at $108.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas A's P/E ratio is 24.87. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to A's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to A. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, IQV has a market cap of 26.53B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while IQV trades at $153.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas IQV's P/E ratio is 20.92. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to IQV's ROE of +0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to IQV. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, WUXAY has a market cap of 22.98B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while WUXAY trades at $7.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas WUXAY's P/E ratio is 14.72. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to WUXAY's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to WUXAY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, MTD has a market cap of 22.92B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while MTD trades at $1,102.64.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas MTD's P/E ratio is 27.26. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to MTD's ROE of +1.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to MTD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, NTRA has a market cap of 22.03B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while NTRA trades at $162.57.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas NTRA's P/E ratio is -105.56. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to NTRA's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to NTRA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, WUXIF has a market cap of 21.45B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while WUXIF trades at $7.34.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas WUXIF's P/E ratio is 13.85. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to WUXIF's ROE of +0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to WUXIF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, WAT has a market cap of 20.88B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while WAT trades at $350.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas WAT's P/E ratio is 31.85. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to WAT's ROE of +0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to WAT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, DGX has a market cap of 19.64B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while DGX trades at $175.90.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas DGX's P/E ratio is 22.24. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to DGX's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to DGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, BMXMF has a market cap of 15.21B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while BMXMF trades at $128.95.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas BMXMF's P/E ratio is 31.37. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to BMXMF's ROE of +0.10%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to BMXMF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, PKI has a market cap of 14.46B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while PKI trades at $115.24.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas PKI's P/E ratio is 41.45. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to PKI's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to PKI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, ILMN has a market cap of 12.59B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while ILMN trades at $79.58.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas ILMN's P/E ratio is -10.35. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to ILMN's ROE of -0.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to ILMN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, ERFSF has a market cap of 11.38B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while ERFSF trades at $64.69.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas ERFSF's P/E ratio is 27.41. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to ERFSF's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to ERFSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, ICLR has a market cap of 11.18B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while ICLR trades at $138.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas ICLR's P/E ratio is 15.10. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to ICLR's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to ICLR. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, RVTY has a market cap of 11.16B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while RVTY trades at $92.86.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas RVTY's P/E ratio is 38.53. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to RVTY's ROE of +0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to RVTY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, TEM has a market cap of 10.96B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while TEM trades at $65.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas TEM's P/E ratio is -12.64. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to TEM's ROE of +21.50%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to TEM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, EXAS has a market cap of 10.01B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while EXAS trades at $53.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas EXAS's P/E ratio is -9.59. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to EXAS's ROE of -0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to EXAS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, QGEN has a market cap of 9.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while QGEN trades at $42.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas QGEN's P/E ratio is 110.92. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to QGEN's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to QGEN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, MEDP has a market cap of 8.65B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while MEDP trades at $300.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas MEDP's P/E ratio is 22.95. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to MEDP's ROE of +0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to MEDP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, SKHHY has a market cap of 7.70B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while SKHHY trades at $16.04.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas SKHHY's P/E ratio is 22.59. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to SKHHY's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to SKHHY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, SKHCF has a market cap of 7.11B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while SKHCF trades at $14.80.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas SKHCF's P/E ratio is 20.56. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to SKHCF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to SKHCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, CRL has a market cap of 6.95B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while CRL trades at $141.53.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas CRL's P/E ratio is 673.95. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to CRL's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to CRL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, DSRLF has a market cap of 5.87B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while DSRLF trades at $109.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas DSRLF's P/E ratio is 28.69. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to DSRLF's ROE of +0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to DSRLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, GH has a market cap of 5.16B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while GH trades at $41.68.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas GH's P/E ratio is -12.29. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to GH's ROE of +3.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to GH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, HNGZY has a market cap of 4.48B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while HNGZY trades at $4.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas HNGZY's P/E ratio is 26.67. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to HNGZY's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to HNGZY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, SYNH has a market cap of 4.46B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while SYNH trades at $42.98.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas SYNH's P/E ratio is 61.40. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to SYNH's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to SYNH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, RDNT has a market cap of 4.17B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while RDNT trades at $56.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas RDNT's P/E ratio is 1409.50. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to RDNT's ROE of +0.02%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to RDNT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, SHC has a market cap of 3.35B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while SHC trades at $11.82.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas SHC's P/E ratio is 73.88. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to SHC's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to SHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, OLK has a market cap of 3.24B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while OLK trades at $26.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas OLK's P/E ratio is -96.59. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to OLK's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to OLK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, TWST has a market cap of 1.95B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while TWST trades at $32.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas TWST's P/E ratio is -10.03. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to TWST's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to TWST. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, VIMGF has a market cap of 1.81B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while VIMGF trades at $3.50.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas VIMGF's P/E ratio is 70.00. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to VIMGF's ROE of +0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to VIMGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, VIVO has a market cap of 1.49B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while VIVO trades at $33.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas VIVO's P/E ratio is 21.09. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to VIVO's ROE of +0.12%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to VIVO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, NEOG has a market cap of 1.30B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while NEOG trades at $5.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas NEOG's P/E ratio is -2.69. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to NEOG's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to NEOG. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, GRAL has a market cap of 1.27B. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while GRAL trades at $36.10.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas GRAL's P/E ratio is -0.57. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to GRAL's ROE of -0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to GRAL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, OPK has a market cap of 999.25M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while OPK trades at $1.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas OPK's P/E ratio is -21.00. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to OPK's ROE of -0.03%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to OPK. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, MRCHF has a market cap of 962.56M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while MRCHF trades at $16.94.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas MRCHF's P/E ratio is -99.65. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to MRCHF's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to MRCHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, CDNA has a market cap of 856.92M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while CDNA trades at $15.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas CDNA's P/E ratio is 13.74. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to CDNA's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to CDNA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, GRALV has a market cap of 579.39M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while GRALV trades at $18.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas GRALV's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to GRALV's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to GRALV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, FLGT has a market cap of 565.03M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while FLGT trades at $18.56.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas FLGT's P/E ratio is -13.95. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to FLGT's ROE of -0.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to FLGT. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, CSTL has a market cap of 496.42M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while CSTL trades at $17.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas CSTL's P/E ratio is 29.17. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to CSTL's ROE of -0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to CSTL. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, PSNL has a market cap of 455.76M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while PSNL trades at $5.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas PSNL's P/E ratio is -3.77. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to PSNL's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to PSNL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, LAB has a market cap of 423.50M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while LAB trades at $1.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas LAB's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to LAB's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to LAB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, CO has a market cap of 400.08M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while CO trades at $2.99.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas CO's P/E ratio is 5.06. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to CO's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to CO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, MYGN has a market cap of 371.45M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while MYGN trades at $4.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas MYGN's P/E ratio is -2.86. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to MYGN's ROE of -0.15%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to MYGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, STIM has a market cap of 306.06M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while STIM trades at $4.65.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas STIM's P/E ratio is -3.37. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to STIM's ROE of -2.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to STIM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, FLDM has a market cap of 294.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while FLDM trades at $3.71.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas FLDM's P/E ratio is -4.74. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to FLDM's ROE of -0.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to FLDM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, NEO has a market cap of 209.77M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while NEO trades at $8.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas NEO's P/E ratio is -13.36. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to NEO's ROE of -0.09%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to NEO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, ATLN has a market cap of 187.25M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while ATLN trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas ATLN's P/E ratio is -0.82. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to ATLN's ROE of -19.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to ATLN. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, IDGXF has a market cap of 187.19M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while IDGXF trades at $0.32.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas IDGXF's P/E ratio is 8.05. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to IDGXF's ROE of +0.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to IDGXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, EDTXF has a market cap of 173.51M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while EDTXF trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas EDTXF's P/E ratio is -15.21. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to EDTXF's ROE of +0.61%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to EDTXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, AMCY has a market cap of 171.27M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while AMCY trades at $3.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas AMCY's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to AMCY's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to AMCY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, NNGRF has a market cap of 164.30M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while NNGRF trades at $12.76.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas NNGRF's P/E ratio is 60.75. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to NNGRF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to NNGRF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, CORBF has a market cap of 145.97M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while CORBF trades at $1.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas CORBF's P/E ratio is 3.03. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to CORBF's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to CORBF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, THOXF has a market cap of 130.94M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while THOXF trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas THOXF's P/E ratio is -14.40. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to THOXF's ROE of -0.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to THOXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, GTH has a market cap of 127.29M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while GTH trades at $4.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas GTH's P/E ratio is -1.11. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to GTH's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to GTH. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, DIUXF has a market cap of 115.49M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while DIUXF trades at $1.37.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas DIUXF's P/E ratio is 136.72. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to DIUXF's ROE of -0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to DIUXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, GENE has a market cap of 111.24M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while GENE trades at $0.77.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas GENE's P/E ratio is -38.25. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to GENE's ROE of -3.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to GENE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, XGN has a market cap of 110.89M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while XGN trades at $6.16.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas XGN's P/E ratio is -7.33. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to XGN's ROE of -1.34%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to XGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, ANPCF has a market cap of 99.98M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while ANPCF trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas ANPCF's P/E ratio is -3.10. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to ANPCF's ROE of -0.54%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to ANPCF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, MDXH has a market cap of 89.59M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while MDXH trades at $1.81.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas MDXH's P/E ratio is -1.56. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to MDXH's ROE of -6.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to MDXH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, SERA has a market cap of 77.81M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while SERA trades at $2.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas SERA's P/E ratio is -2.14. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to SERA's ROE of -0.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to SERA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, NOTV has a market cap of 75.02M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while NOTV trades at $2.22.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas NOTV's P/E ratio is -0.48. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to NOTV's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to NOTV. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, TIHE has a market cap of 71.85M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while TIHE trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas TIHE's P/E ratio is 0.32. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to TIHE's ROE of +0.01%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to TIHE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, PRENW has a market cap of 68.20M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while PRENW trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas PRENW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to PRENW's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to PRENW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, PRE has a market cap of 67.78M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while PRE trades at $5.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas PRE's P/E ratio is -1.29. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to PRE's ROE of -0.25%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to PRE. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, BIOGF has a market cap of 65.41M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while BIOGF trades at $0.66.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas BIOGF's P/E ratio is -0.67. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to BIOGF's ROE of +2.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to BIOGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, PCNEF has a market cap of 63.00M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while PCNEF trades at $2.28.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas PCNEF's P/E ratio is -8.44. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to PCNEF's ROE of -0.21%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to PCNEF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, VNRX has a market cap of 52.15M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while VNRX trades at $0.52.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas VNRX's P/E ratio is -1.67. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to VNRX's ROE of +1.29%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to VNRX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, BDSX has a market cap of 50.93M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while BDSX trades at $0.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas BDSX's P/E ratio is -1.05. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to BDSX's ROE of -2.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to BDSX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, PFGTF has a market cap of 50.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while PFGTF trades at $0.06.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas PFGTF's P/E ratio is -3.11. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to PFGTF's ROE of -0.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to PFGTF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, OPGN has a market cap of 46.41M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while OPGN trades at $4.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas OPGN's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to OPGN's ROE of +1.20%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to OPGN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, BIOQ has a market cap of 44.69M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while BIOQ trades at $50.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas BIOQ's P/E ratio is 14.41. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to BIOQ's ROE of -0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to BIOQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, STRRP has a market cap of 29.70M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while STRRP trades at $9.26.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas STRRP's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to STRRP's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to STRRP. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, CLIFF has a market cap of 29.65M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while CLIFF trades at $0.12.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas CLIFF's P/E ratio is -1.93. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to CLIFF's ROE of -0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to CLIFF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, ANPCY has a market cap of 29.32M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while ANPCY trades at $0.91.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas ANPCY's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to ANPCY's ROE of -0.75%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to ANPCY. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, DRIO has a market cap of 29.12M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while DRIO trades at $0.70.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas DRIO's P/E ratio is -1.15. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to DRIO's ROE of -0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to DRIO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, AKU has a market cap of 26.27M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while AKU trades at $0.29.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas AKU's P/E ratio is -0.13. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to AKU's ROE of -5.32%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to AKU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, PMSNF has a market cap of 23.61M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while PMSNF trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas PMSNF's P/E ratio is -4.00. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to PMSNF's ROE of +0.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to PMSNF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, ADVB has a market cap of 23.15M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while ADVB trades at $1.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas ADVB's P/E ratio is -7.64. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to ADVB's ROE of -2.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to ADVB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, SNANF has a market cap of 22.75M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while SNANF trades at $0.21.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas SNANF's P/E ratio is -10.50. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to SNANF's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to SNANF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, VILGF has a market cap of 20.67M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while VILGF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas VILGF's P/E ratio is -0.30. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to VILGF's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to VILGF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, IMMVF has a market cap of 19.33M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while IMMVF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas IMMVF's P/E ratio is -0.32. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to IMMVF's ROE of -2.69%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to IMMVF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, LDXHF has a market cap of 19.09M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while LDXHF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas LDXHF's P/E ratio is -2.55. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to LDXHF's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to LDXHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, PCHM has a market cap of 17.38M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while PCHM trades at $2.97.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas PCHM's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to PCHM's ROE of +0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to PCHM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, CEMI has a market cap of 16.71M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while CEMI trades at $0.46.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas CEMI's P/E ratio is -0.63. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to CEMI's ROE of -0.89%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to CEMI. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, ENZ has a market cap of 16.44M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while ENZ trades at $0.31.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas ENZ's P/E ratio is -2.24. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to ENZ's ROE of -0.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to ENZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, PMD has a market cap of 15.74M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while PMD trades at $2.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas PMD's P/E ratio is -5.24. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to PMD's ROE of -0.33%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to PMD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, BMKDF has a market cap of 15.45M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while BMKDF trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas BMKDF's P/E ratio is -17.00. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to BMKDF's ROE of +2.24%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to BMKDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, ABDXF has a market cap of 13.55M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while ABDXF trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas ABDXF's P/E ratio is -1.40. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to ABDXF's ROE of -0.63%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to ABDXF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, ME has a market cap of 13.34M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while ME trades at $0.61.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas ME's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to ME's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to ME. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, BNGO has a market cap of 11.94M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while BNGO trades at $3.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas BNGO's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to BNGO's ROE of -1.81%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to BNGO. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, IZOZF has a market cap of 10.90M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while IZOZF trades at $0.18.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas IZOZF's P/E ratio is -6.00. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to IZOZF's ROE of +0.47%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to IZOZF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, PRPO has a market cap of 9.78M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while PRPO trades at $6.45.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas PRPO's P/E ratio is -2.20. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to PRPO's ROE of -0.35%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to PRPO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, CNTG has a market cap of 9.43M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while CNTG trades at $0.33.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas CNTG's P/E ratio is -0.23. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to CNTG's ROE of +3.98%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to CNTG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, MXDHF has a market cap of 8.65M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while MXDHF trades at $0.25.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas MXDHF's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to MXDHF's ROE of -6.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to MXDHF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, INBS has a market cap of 8.17M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while INBS trades at $1.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas INBS's P/E ratio is 10.00. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to INBS's ROE of -1.43%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to INBS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, MYNZ has a market cap of 7.75M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while MYNZ trades at $2.55.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas MYNZ's P/E ratio is -0.12. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to MYNZ's ROE of -16.99%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to MYNZ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, STRR has a market cap of 7.53M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while STRR trades at $2.35.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas STRR's P/E ratio is -0.71. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to STRR's ROE of -0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to STRR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, VRCDF has a market cap of 7.28M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while VRCDF trades at $0.03.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas VRCDF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to VRCDF's ROE of -0.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to VRCDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, GNTLF has a market cap of 6.07M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while GNTLF trades at $1.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas GNTLF's P/E ratio is -16.67. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to GNTLF's ROE of -3.62%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to GNTLF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, SQIDF has a market cap of 6.07M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while SQIDF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas SQIDF's P/E ratio is -0.37. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to SQIDF's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to SQIDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, APDN has a market cap of 5.50M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while APDN trades at $0.85.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas APDN's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to APDN's ROE of -1.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to APDN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, NVTA has a market cap of 5.44M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while NVTA trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas NVTA's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to NVTA's ROE of +1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to NVTA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, TDSGF has a market cap of 5.39M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while TDSGF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas TDSGF's P/E ratio is -1.80. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to TDSGF's ROE of -3.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to TDSGF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, LMDXW has a market cap of 5.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while LMDXW trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas LMDXW's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to LMDXW's ROE of -15.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to LMDXW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, LMDX has a market cap of 5.10M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while LMDX trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas LMDX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to LMDX's ROE of -15.58%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to LMDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, CHEK has a market cap of 5.09M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while CHEK trades at $0.87.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas CHEK's P/E ratio is -0.41. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to CHEK's ROE of -0.52%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to CHEK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, AVCRF has a market cap of 5.06M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while AVCRF trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas AVCRF's P/E ratio is -5.00. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to AVCRF's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to AVCRF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, BGLC has a market cap of 4.80M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while BGLC trades at $2.67.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas BGLC's P/E ratio is -2.97. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to BGLC's ROE of -0.17%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to BGLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, SLDX has a market cap of 4.78M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while SLDX trades at $0.05.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas SLDX's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to SLDX's ROE of +0.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to SLDX. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, RNVA has a market cap of 4.31M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while RNVA trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas RNVA's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to RNVA's ROE of +0.23%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to RNVA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, JMPHF has a market cap of 4.18M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while JMPHF trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas JMPHF's P/E ratio is -0.91. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to JMPHF's ROE of -0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to JMPHF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, TTOO has a market cap of 3.90M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while TTOO trades at $0.14.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas TTOO's P/E ratio is -4.64. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to TTOO's ROE of +2.06%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to TTOO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, BIAFW has a market cap of 3.88M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while BIAFW trades at $0.17.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas BIAFW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to BIAFW's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to BIAFW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, BIAF has a market cap of 3.68M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while BIAF trades at $0.20.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas BIAF's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to BIAF's ROE of -2.51%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to BIAF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, SZLSF has a market cap of 3.57M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while SZLSF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas SZLSF's P/E ratio is -0.02. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to SZLSF's ROE of +0.13%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to SZLSF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, NDRA has a market cap of 3.46M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while NDRA trades at $6.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas NDRA's P/E ratio is -0.11. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to NDRA's ROE of -2.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to NDRA. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, DMTK has a market cap of 3.29M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while DMTK trades at $0.09.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas DMTK's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to DMTK's ROE of -1.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to DMTK. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, IDXG has a market cap of 3.24M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while IDXG trades at $0.74.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas IDXG's P/E ratio is 1.79. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to IDXG's ROE of -0.66%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to IDXG. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, IDTA has a market cap of 3.03M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while IDTA trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas IDTA's P/E ratio is 7.50. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to IDTA's ROE of +0.36%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to IDTA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, AWH has a market cap of 2.89M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while AWH trades at $0.08.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas AWH's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to AWH's ROE of +5.16%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to AWH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, ISPC has a market cap of 2.87M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while ISPC trades at $1.15.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas ISPC's P/E ratio is -0.07. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to ISPC's ROE of -2.39%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to ISPC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, BNR has a market cap of 2.58M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while BNR trades at $2.40.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas BNR's P/E ratio is -0.52. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to BNR's ROE of -0.53%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to BNR. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, SQL has a market cap of 2.51M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while SQL trades at $6.60.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas SQL's P/E ratio is -0.40. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to SQL's ROE of -0.67%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to SQL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, ICBU has a market cap of 2.05M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while ICBU trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas ICBU's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to ICBU's ROE of +0.70%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to ICBU. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, RSHN has a market cap of 1.63M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while RSHN trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas RSHN's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to RSHN's ROE of -5.42%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to RSHN. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, IBXXF has a market cap of 1.61M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while IBXXF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas IBXXF's P/E ratio is -0.27. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to IBXXF's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to IBXXF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, IVRO has a market cap of 1.53M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while IVRO trades at $0.07.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas IVRO's P/E ratio is -0.84. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to IVRO's ROE of +0.08%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to IVRO. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, DIGP has a market cap of 1.09M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while DIGP trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas DIGP's P/E ratio is -1.04. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to DIGP's ROE of +0.05%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to DIGP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, HTGM has a market cap of 1.06M. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while HTGM trades at $0.48.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas HTGM's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to HTGM's ROE of -2.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to HTGM. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, SCRSF has a market cap of 858977.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while SCRSF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas SCRSF's P/E ratio is -0.09. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to SCRSF's ROE of +2.91%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to SCRSF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, SQLLW has a market cap of 837087.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while SQLLW trades at $0.02.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas SQLLW's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to SQLLW's ROE of -19.68%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to SQLLW. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, EPGNF has a market cap of 692790.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while EPGNF trades at $0.79.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas EPGNF's P/E ratio is -0.04. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to EPGNF's ROE of -4.14%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to EPGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, NSTM has a market cap of 468815.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while NSTM trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas NSTM's P/E ratio is -0.14. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to NSTM's ROE of +0.87%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to NSTM. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, BIOC has a market cap of 450786.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while BIOC trades at $0.43.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas BIOC's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to BIOC's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to BIOC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, TRIB has a market cap of 424631.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while TRIB trades at $0.75.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas TRIB's P/E ratio is -0.33. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to TRIB's ROE of +0.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to TRIB. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, MBGNF has a market cap of 172578.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while MBGNF trades at $0.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas MBGNF's P/E ratio is -1.00. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to MBGNF's ROE of +0.37%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to MBGNF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, NVTAQ has a market cap of 85948.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while NVTAQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas NVTAQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to NVTAQ's ROE of +1.79%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to NVTAQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, ARYC has a market cap of 79348.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while ARYC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas ARYC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to ARYC's ROE of +0.55%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to ARYC. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, HCLC has a market cap of 73985.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while HCLC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas HCLC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to HCLC's ROE of +0.11%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to HCLC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, MEDVF has a market cap of 54038.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while MEDVF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas MEDVF's P/E ratio is -0.03. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to MEDVF's ROE of +0.57%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to MEDVF. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, CHHL has a market cap of 37320.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while CHHL trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas CHHL's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to CHHL's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to CHHL. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, IHTI has a market cap of 32514.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while IHTI trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas IHTI's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to IHTI's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to IHTI. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, MEDD has a market cap of 31910.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while MEDD trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas MEDD's P/E ratio is -0.01. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to MEDD's ROE of +0.74%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to MEDD. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, CGNH has a market cap of 24046.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while CGNH trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas CGNH's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to CGNH's ROE of +1.41%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to CGNH. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, TOMDF has a market cap of 14081.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while TOMDF trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas TOMDF's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to TOMDF's ROE of +0.84%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to TOMDF. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, ABMC has a market cap of 4810.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while ABMC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas ABMC's P/E ratio is 0.01. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to ABMC's ROE of +0.86%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to ABMC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, RGDXQ has a market cap of 3880.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while RGDXQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas RGDXQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to RGDXQ's ROE of -1.27%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to RGDXQ. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, DMTKQ has a market cap of 3525.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while DMTKQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas DMTKQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to DMTKQ's ROE of -0.80%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to DMTKQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, GWHP has a market cap of 1313.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while GWHP trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas GWHP's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to GWHP's ROE of +0.00%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to GWHP. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, CYPS has a market cap of 811.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while CYPS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas CYPS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to CYPS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to CYPS. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, ROSGQ has a market cap of 593.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while ROSGQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas ROSGQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to ROSGQ's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to ROSGQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, BIOCQ has a market cap of 263.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while BIOCQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas BIOCQ's P/E ratio is -0.00. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to BIOCQ's ROE of -1.38%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to BIOCQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, HTGMQ has a market cap of 221.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while HTGMQ trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas HTGMQ's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to HTGMQ's ROE of -2.73%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to HTGMQ. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, OPGX has a market cap of 17.00. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while OPGX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas OPGX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to OPGX's ROE of +0.46%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to OPGX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, AGHC comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while AGHC trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas AGHC's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to AGHC's ROE of +2.90%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to AGHC. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, EPGNY comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while EPGNY trades at $2.39.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas EPGNY's P/E ratio is -1.60. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to EPGNY's ROE of -0.19%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to EPGNY. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, OCDX comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while OCDX trades at $17.63.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas OCDX's P/E ratio is -42.28. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to OCDX's ROE of +0.18%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to OCDX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, DHR-PA comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while DHR-PA trades at $1,841.01.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas DHR-PA's P/E ratio is 233.57. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to DHR-PA's ROE of +0.07%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to DHR-PA. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, BGNX comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while BGNX trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas BGNX's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to BGNX's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to BGNX. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, MRPS comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while MRPS trades at $0.00.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas MRPS's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to MRPS's ROE of N/A. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is more volatile compared to MRPS. This indicates potentially higher risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.

ACRS plays a significant role within the Healthcare sector. Its performance reflects broader market trends and attracts considerable investor interest.

Comparing market capitalization, ACRS stands at 142.39M. In comparison, MEUSW comparison data is unavailable. Regarding current trading prices, ACRS is priced at $1.32, while MEUSW trades at $1.38.

To assess relative profitability and valuation, we examine the Return on Equity (ROE) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) ratios.

ACRS currently has a P/E ratio of -0.77, whereas MEUSW's P/E ratio is N/A. In terms of profitability, ACRS's ROE is -0.94%, compared to MEUSW's ROE of -3.04%. Regarding short-term risk, ACRS is less volatile compared to MEUSW. This indicates potentially lower risk in terms of short-term price fluctuations for ACRS.